Bug 20257

Summary: Holds - Branch Transfer Limits
Product: Koha Reporter: Kyle M Hall <kyle>
Component: Architecture, internals, and plumbingAssignee: Jesse Maseto <jesse>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low CC: katrin.fischer
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:

Description Kyle M Hall 2018-02-21 08:00:12 UTC
Modify C4::Reserve::AddReserve to check if placing the hold would violate Branch
Transfer Limits, if UseBranchTransferLimits is enabled. If so, deny the hold.
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2018-02-23 08:50:15 UTC
I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports concerning the branch transfer limits:

Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds 
Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in Staff client
Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a hold/reservation in OPAC

Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there. Discussion might still be interesting.
Comment 2 Kyle M Hall 2018-06-22 14:08:40 UTC
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1)
> I think this is a possible duplicate to some other existing bug reports
> concerning the branch transfer limits:
> 
> Bug 7614 - Branch transfer limit and holds 
> Bug 11020 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a
> hold/reservation in Staff client
> Bug 10993 - Transfer limits should be checked when placing a
> hold/reservation in OPAC
> 
> Kyle, can you please check and mark duplicate if it fits? The other bugs
> have patches, but not sure if something can be salvaged from there.
> Discussion might still be interesting.

Thanks for letting me know! It definitely appears worth picking back up on some of those!
Comment 3 Kyle M Hall 2018-09-19 14:13:32 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7614 ***