Summary: | x subfield missing from item records | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | ||
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: |
Description
Nicole C. Engard
2010-05-26 00:02:48 UTC
This is an enhancement request, and one that could be better described IMO. The Koha item record does not have a non-private notes field, just a general notes field. Whether or not it gets mapped to 952$x in the MARC framework is not actually relevant. Extended this a bit further, another thing that could be done would be to support more than one note for per item; in other words, rather than just have a general notes field, or even two notes fields (public and private), a better enhancement might be to support allowing an arbitrary number of notes to be attached to an item record. Sorry it was poorly worded, I had a cataloger ask where the $x subfield was in the item record. I know that on the Koha to Marc mapping : /cgi-bin/koha/admin/koha2marclinks.pl after choosing 'items' there is an $x subfield already listed - so Koha knows about it - it's just not on the add or edit item record. Or I'm just making the wrong assumption. This isn't an issue in the current HEAD - the field is there on the item record. Closing. |