Summary: | Help on summary field in authority type editor | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Chris Cormack <chris> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | alex.arnaud, julian.maurice, katrin.fischer, marie-luce.laflamme, veron |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Attachments: | Proposed patch |
Created attachment 3469 [details]
Proposed patch
Comment on attachment 3469 [details]
Proposed patch
The attachment has been added here by mistake. I am sorry -- I do not know how to erase it...
Still valid? Hi Janusz, could you give an example we could use in the manual? I am not sure what xxx and yyy would be. Is this still valid? Should we include this in the documentation? |
I have dug through C4::AuthoritiesMarc::BuildSummary and, if I understand well, what on-line help says on summary: >> The summary contains an "ISBD" like description to explain how the entry must be shown in the result list. The syntax is : * [xxxFFFSyyy] where are up to 3 digits BEFORE the field, FFF the field number, S the subfield code, yyy up to 3 digits AFTER the field. * things outside [] are kept as is (including HTML) * repeatable fields are managed. << is relevant for UNIMARC authorities *ONLY*. For MARC21 the content of the summary field, taken as string, will just precede the summary constructed by the function. Am I right? If so then I think this remark should be in the help file not to confuse users. Regards, Janusz