Display Count of items in PROC shelving location.
Created attachment 2902 [details] [review] Display list of items which are to be cataloged in the cataloguing home page.
This bug is mentioned in: Bug 5523 - Display list of items which are to be cataloged in the cataloguing home page. http://lists.koha-community.org/pipermail/koha-patches/2010-December/013461.html
Patch requires rebasing: still uses .tmpl files. New system preference (catalgouinginprocess) seems to be misspelled. Directly modifies kohaversion to (now taken) DB revision number; should use "XXX" instead, so release manager can assign number. This also uses Zebra to find candidate records, rather than items.location.... this seems odd to me. I'm not sure I see the advantage, and the disadvantage would be that rebuild_zebra.pl needs to run before these materials would show up in the display.
Created attachment 14352 [details] [review] Bug 5523 - Display list of items which are to be cataloged in the cataloguing home page.
I have rebased this patch, It now applies, but it needs a test plan if anyone is going to be able to sign off
Patch still has TMPL markup in the changes to the include file. It also includes updates to the NoZebraIndexes preference definition in sysprefs.sql without a corresponding change in updatedatabase.pl Is this change relevant to the patch? Please revise and add a test plan.
This seems to have been abandoned. Resetting to NEW in case it is a feature someone else wants to pick up.
I am not sure of the use case here. Probably PROC should not be hardcoded, as for other libraries it might have different meaning (still needs to be labelled, but is already catalougued). So probably we'd need a good way to mark things for 'awaiting proper cataloguing'?
I reckon we could rethink this after bug 31162 now.
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #9) > I reckon we could rethink this after bug 31162 now. I think that Liz is right at https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9373#c5 when she says folk should just use Javascript to display it. And yeah that's something to explore more after bug 31162 I think...
*** Bug 9373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***