@@ -, +, @@ --- t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t +++ a/t/db_dependent/Authority/Merge.t @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ subtest 'Merging authorities should handle deletes (BZ 18070)' => sub { }; subtest "Test some specific postponed merge issues" => sub { - plan tests => 4; + plan tests => 5; my $authmarc = MARC::Record->new; $authmarc->append_fields( MARC::Field->new( '109', '', '', 'a' => 'aa', b => 'bb' )); @@ -328,6 +328,20 @@ subtest "Test some specific postponed merge issues" => sub { $restored_mocks->{auth_mod}->unmock_all; $biblio = C4::Biblio::GetMarcBiblio({ biblionumber => $biblionumber }); is( $biblio->subfield('109', '9'), $id, 'If the 109 is no longer present, another modify merge would not bring it back' ); + # Bug 22437 however presented scenario C->B, B->A (B and A should have linkcount>limit) + # This results in: postponed merge B->B, run merge C->B, delete C, and postponed A->A, postponed B->A, delete B + # Showing what happens if merge.pl did not remove the B->B merge from the queue + t::lib::Mocks::mock_preference('AuthorityMergeLimit', 2); + @linkedrecords = ( 1, 2, 3 ); # these biblionumbers do not matter, count>=2 + $id = AddAuthority( $authmarc, undef, $authtype1 ); # this is B + $biblio->delete_fields( $biblio->field('109') ); # cleanup + $biblio->append_fields( MARC::Field->new( '109', '', '', a => 'a', 9 => $id ) ); # a biblio connected to B + ModBiblio( $biblio, $biblionumber, '' ); + DelAuthority({ authid => $id, skip_merge => 1 }); # delete B when doing B->A + merge({ mergefrom => $id, mergeto => $id, MARCto => undef, biblionumbers => [ $biblionumber ] }); # destructive B->B from cron + $biblio = C4::Biblio::GetMarcBiblio({ biblionumber => $biblionumber }); + my @fields = $biblio->field('109'); + is( scalar @fields, 0, 'No field 109: the B,B merge was destructive, so needs to be removed.' ); }; subtest "Graceful resolution of missing reporting tag" => sub { --