@@ -, +, @@ table - If your database has items with suitably cataloged items, use these. Otherwise you could use the examples from the bug report: - Catalog items with the following barcodes: B 29 V55 1998 B29 .C55 2008 B29 .L24 1983 B29 .L264 1998 B29 .P666 2004 Make sure the LOC is selected in $2 as source of classification This makes sure the sortable form of the callnumber is calculated correctly. - Go to inventory - Search for your items - Before patch, they should sort on callnumber as above, after the patch the correct sort order should be: B29 .C55 2008 B29 .L24 1983 B29 .L264 1998 B29 .P666 2004 B 29 V55 1998 --- koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/tools/inventory.tt | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/tools/inventory.tt +++ a/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/tools/inventory.tt @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ [% UNLESS uploadedbarcodesflag %]Seen[% END %] Barcode - Call number + Call number Library Title Not for loan @@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ [% result.barcode | html %] - [% result.itemcallnumber | html %] + + [% result.itemcallnumber | html %] + [% Branches.GetName( result.homebranch ) | html %] [% result.location | html %] --