From 89d97c20a3a4a7defec926b87096dd498a9092dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Renvoize Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:50:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Bug 29552: (follow-up) Reverse SCSS declaration order I'm not sure why, but the order matters in this SCSS declaration. If the &:hover is placed below the &:disabled, as it was, then it appears to negate the effect of the &:disabled rule entirely. Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize --- koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/css/src/_flatpickr.scss | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/css/src/_flatpickr.scss b/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/css/src/_flatpickr.scss index 34d1ce6ffe..be9647d825 100644 --- a/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/css/src/_flatpickr.scss +++ b/koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/css/src/_flatpickr.scss @@ -990,6 +990,10 @@ span.flatpickr-weekday { font-size: 90%; margin: 2px; + &:hover { + color: #538200; + } + &:disabled { color: #999; @@ -997,10 +1001,6 @@ span.flatpickr-weekday { color: #999; } } - - &:hover { - color: #538200; - } } } } -- 2.20.1