From 6d02cb4c59c51cf0740bd5e02414b12487b694da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Poulain Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:38:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Bug 8981 follow-up: case While QAing your patch, I saw you were writting "MarcFlavour", it should have been "marcflavour" Will work with the UC, but let's be consistent. This patch fixes another MarcFlavour just a few lines before I spotted by chance --- opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl b/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl index 86ecb23..3e17cf1 100755 --- a/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl +++ b/opac/opac-authoritiesdetail.pl @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ if ($show_marc) { my @subfields_data; # skip UNIMARC fields <200, they are useless for a patron - next if C4::Context->preference('MarcFlavour') eq 'UNIMARC' && $field->tag() <200; + next if C4::Context->preference('marcflavour') eq 'UNIMARC' && $field->tag() <200; # if tag <10, there's no subfield, use the "@" trick if ( $field->tag() < 10 ) { @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ if ($show_marc) { $subfield_data{marc_tag} = $field->tag(); push( @subfields_data, \%subfield_data ); } - elsif ( C4::Context->preference('MarcFlavour') eq 'MARC21' && $field->tag() eq 667 ) { + elsif ( C4::Context->preference('marcflavour') eq 'MARC21' && $field->tag() eq 667 ) { # tagfield 667 is a nonpublic general note in MARC21, which shouldn't be shown in the OPAC } else { -- 1.7.9.5