Back to bug 32950
| Who | When | What | Removed | Added |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| katrin.fischer | 2023-02-13 19:16:51 UTC | Severity | minor | normal |
| Summary | marc modification template moving subfield can lose values for repeatable fields | MARC modification template moving subfield can lose values for repeatable fields | ||
| martin.renvoize | 2023-03-17 11:02:16 UTC | CC | martin.renvoize, nick | |
| martin.renvoize | 2023-07-26 12:58:37 UTC | CC | katrin.fischer | |
| janet.mcgowan | 2025-09-10 13:09:26 UTC | CC | janet.mcgowan | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-09-23 09:51:52 UTC | Status | NEW | Needs Signoff |
| Assignee | koha-bugs | martin.renvoize | ||
| martin.renvoize | 2025-09-23 09:53:11 UTC | Version | 21.11 | Main |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:34:30 UTC | Keywords | Manual | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:34:48 UTC | Patch complexity | --- | Small patch |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:37:08 UTC | Attachment #187184 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:37:19 UTC | Attachment #187185 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:39:04 UTC | Attachment #186781 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:39:06 UTC | Attachment #186782 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:39:15 UTC | Status | Needs Signoff | Signed Off |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:39:28 UTC | Comment 5 Tag | important | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:39:58 UTC | Comment 6 Tag | obsolete | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:04 UTC | Comment 7 Tag | obsolete | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:09 UTC | Comment 8 Tag | important | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:13 UTC | Comment 9 Tag | important | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:23 UTC | Comment 0 Tag | obsolete | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:25 UTC | Comment 2 Tag | obsolete | |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-01 12:40:28 UTC | Comment 3 Tag | obsolete | |
| jonathan.druart | 2025-10-06 09:29:33 UTC | Keywords | release-notes-needed | |
| CC | jonathan.druart | |||
| jonathan.druart | 2025-10-06 09:30:18 UTC | Status | Signed Off | Passed QA |
| jonathan.druart | 2025-10-06 09:30:21 UTC | Attachment #187186 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 |
| Attachment #187187 Attachment is obsolete | 0 | 1 | ||
| lucas | 2025-10-06 15:16:30 UTC | Status | Passed QA | Pushed to main |
| Version(s) released in | 25.11.00 | |||
| lucas | 2025-10-06 17:12:30 UTC | CC | lucas | |
| Keywords | additional_work_needed | |||
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-07 16:57:47 UTC | Status | Pushed to main | Passed QA |
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-07 16:59:09 UTC | Text to go in the release notes | MARC modification templates now correctly preserve existing values when moving subfields within repeatable fields. Previously, causing data loss. **What's fixed:** - Existing subfield values in fields that don't contain the source subfield are now preserved - Source subfield values are only moved to the corresponding target positions in fields that actually contain the, those existing $a values would be overwritten or lost. **Example scenario:** Given multiple 020 fields: - 020$a with existing ISBN - 020$a with another existing ISBN - 020$z with cancelled ISBN (to be moved to $a) - 020$z with another, moving subfields could cause data loss or duplication when the source subfield didn't exist in all instances of the repeatable field. **The problem:** When using a MARC modification template to move a subfield within a repeatable field (for source subfield - The move operation correctly removes the source subfields after copying their values - Field order and other subfields are maintained correctly **For cataloguers:** MARC modification template "move" operations now work reliably cancelled ISBN (to be moved to $a) Previously, when moving 020$z to 020$a, the first two existing 020$a values would be replaced with values from the 020$z fields example, moving 020$z to 020$a), if some 020 fields had existing $a values but no $z values with repeatable fields. When moving subfields, only the fields that contain the source subfield will be affected, and all other existing values in the repeatable fields will be preserved. |
|
| martin.renvoize | 2025-10-07 16:59:18 UTC | Keywords | additional_work_needed, release-notes-needed | |
| lucas | 2025-10-07 17:02:10 UTC | Status | Passed QA | Pushed to main |
| paul.derscheid | 2025-10-23 21:10:34 UTC | Status | Pushed to main | Pushed to stable |
| Version(s) released in | 25.11.00 | 25.11.00,25.05.05 |
Back to bug 32950