Bug 10472

Summary: Receipt by line or invoice
Product: Koha Reporter: Amit Gupta <amitddng135>
Component: AcquisitionsAssignee: Amit Gupta <amitddng135>
Status: Failed QA --- QA Contact:
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low CC: colin.campbell, janet.mcgowan, kyle, marjorie.barry-vila, Niamh.WalkerHeadon, paul.poulain, srdjan, veron
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
See Also: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10440
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: Receipt by line or invoice
Bug 10472 - Receipt by line or invoice

Description Amit Gupta 2013-06-15 06:31:13 UTC
To select to ‘receipt in’ items either by per line or the entire invoice.
Comment 1 Amit Gupta 2013-06-24 12:09:51 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Srdjan Jankovic 2013-07-26 03:50:54 UTC
Amit,

Would you consider moving the query to C4::Acquisition please?

Also, it is slightly nicer to say
my $count = $dbh->selectrow_array("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM aqorders_items ...")
Comment 3 Mark Tompsett 2015-04-18 20:22:39 UTC
Created attachment 38121 [details] [review]
Bug 10472 - Receipt by line or invoice

To select to ‘receipt in’ items either by per line
or the entire invoice.

Test plan:
1) Acquisitions preferences should be "AcqCreateItem ->
placing an order".
2) Create a basket.
3) Create orders under basket and close the basket.
4) Click on Receive shipment button.
5) Enter invoice number, shipmentdate and cost.
6) Search Basketno which you want to receive for ex: basketno 50
and click on filter button.
7) After search "Receipt all" link is appear.
8) Click on "Receipt all" link you would be able to receive all
the order against the basketno.

Sponsored-by: Staffordshire University/Halton Borough Council/PTFS Europe

http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10440
Comment 4 Katrin Fischer 2015-07-28 22:27:39 UTC
Should this be "needs signoff" or even "signed off"?
Comment 5 Paul Poulain 2016-06-17 15:43:40 UTC
probably a lost in limbo patch...
Comment 6 Owen Leonard 2016-08-09 12:39:20 UTC
(In reply to Srdjan Jankovic from comment #2)
> 
> Would you consider moving the query to C4::Acquisition please?

I don't think this is optional.