Summary: | in UNIMARC, pubdate index should be based on 100 field and not 210 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro> |
Component: | Searching | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | ||
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: |
Description
Mathieu Saby
2013-10-09 17:24:09 UTC
An other option would be to declare pubdate index both on 210$d AND 100pos9-12 So, if a library does not have 100 filled, the record will still be indexed with 210. M. Saby in MARC21 : 261$c is index in "copydate" 210 is the UNIMARC equivalent. So let's index too 210$d in "copydate" |