| Summary: | in UNIMARC, pubdate index should be based on 100 field and not 210 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro> |
| Component: | Searching | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | ||
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Mathieu Saby
2013-10-09 17:24:09 UTC
An other option would be to declare pubdate index both on 210$d AND 100pos9-12 So, if a library does not have 100 filled, the record will still be indexed with 210. M. Saby in MARC21 : 261$c is index in "copydate" 210 is the UNIMARC equivalent. So let's index too 210$d in "copydate" |