Summary: | Item search should include note fields | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Component: | Searching | Assignee: | Laura Escamilla <Laura.escamilla> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | catrina, hebah, inkeri.hakulinen+bugz, janne.seppanen, Laura.escamilla |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23565 | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: |
Description
Nicole C. Engard
2015-03-11 18:51:03 UTC
Still very valid. The only way now to search and display note fiels in a result kind list is by using a custom report. Now that we can configure what columns are shown by default in the item search table, it would be a good addition to give users the ability to show item notes in it. We use the both item note types e.g. when there's a need to add additional, relevant data to an item record that isn't covered in other item fields. Both public and nonpublic notes can be added using Item search fields, but they do not display on the table, nor display when exported via CSV. Libraries would love if this were visible and available when exported. I agree, item notes (both types) should be visible on the result table. Should we make a new bug report about this, since this bug title does not refer to the new problem? I filed a new bug about how the search results are shown: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39763 |