Summary: | Ability to add custom fields to OPAC purchase suggestion form | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Pablo AB <pablo.bianchi> |
Component: | OPAC | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | katrin.fischer, koha, lisettepalouse+koha, marjorie.barry-vila, veron |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: |
Description
Pablo AB
2015-04-22 16:17:37 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 21329 *** Shouldn't always newer bugs marked duplicated of older ones, instead of the other way around? At least unless the newer have much more info. Marking older bugs duplicate of newer ones give the wrong impression that this request is recent. (In reply to Pablo AB from comment #2) > Shouldn't always newer bugs marked duplicated of older ones, instead of the > other way around? At least unless the newer have much more info. > > Marking older bugs duplicate of newer ones give the wrong impression that > this request is recent. You are right Pablo that this is the general rule. Tbh, I was not sure if this was active and picked the other for the recent activity on it. It sure is debatable. |