Summary: | price labels are not consistent in acq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Component: | Acquisitions | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | cunha, marjorie.barry-vila, sfayle |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
Attachments: |
order screen labels
fund list labels fund management view invoice labels order search labels price labels on item ordered search labels spent fund search |
Created attachment 38681 [details]
fund list labels
Created attachment 38682 [details]
fund management view
Created attachment 38683 [details]
invoice labels
Created attachment 38684 [details]
order search labels
Created attachment 38687 [details]
price labels on item
Created attachment 38688 [details]
ordered search labels
Created attachment 38689 [details]
spent fund search
I think: Unit cost = vendor price est = budgeted = estimated unit price replacement cost = rrp Etc etc. |
Created attachment 38680 [details] order screen labels In acquisitions the price fields are inconsistently labeled. There are 4 price fields: vendor price estimated cost replacement cost actual cost However as you can see in the screenshots it says it differently everywhere. Some phrases: * Unit price * RRP * EST * Budgeted cost * Actual cost * Base-level And more.