Bug 14081

Summary: price labels are not consistent in acq
Product: Koha Reporter: Nicole C. Engard <nengard>
Component: AcquisitionsAssignee: Bugs List <koha-bugs>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: normal    
Priority: P5 - low CC: cunha, marjorie.barry-vila, sfayle
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
GIT URL: Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: --- Documentation contact:
Documentation submission: Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: order screen labels
fund list labels
fund management view
invoice labels
order search labels
price labels on item
ordered search labels
spent fund search

Description Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:08:44 UTC
Created attachment 38680 [details]
order screen labels

In acquisitions the price fields are inconsistently labeled.

There are 4 price fields:

vendor price
estimated cost
replacement cost
actual cost

However as you can see in the screenshots it says it differently everywhere.

Some phrases:

* Unit price
* RRP
* EST
* Budgeted cost
* Actual cost
* Base-level

And more.
Comment 1 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:09:01 UTC
Created attachment 38681 [details]
fund list labels
Comment 2 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:09:40 UTC
Created attachment 38682 [details]
fund management view
Comment 3 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:10:02 UTC
Created attachment 38683 [details]
invoice labels
Comment 4 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:10:19 UTC
Created attachment 38684 [details]
order search labels
Comment 5 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:19:08 UTC
Created attachment 38687 [details]
price labels on item
Comment 6 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:21:25 UTC
Created attachment 38688 [details]
ordered search labels
Comment 7 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:22:03 UTC
Created attachment 38689 [details]
spent fund search
Comment 8 Nicole C. Engard 2015-04-29 20:22:44 UTC
I think:

Unit cost = vendor price
est = budgeted = estimated unit price 
replacement cost = rrp

Etc etc.