| Summary: | 773x ISSN Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
| Component: | Searching | Assignee: | Galen Charlton <gmcharlt> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | oleonard |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14341 | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Nicole C. Engard
2015-06-05 13:38:44 UTC
I am not sure what Nicole meant here, can someone help? I assume she meant that we should add the field to the ISSN search index. But I see some problems there: It would give you many more results when searching by ISSN in databases that include article records. What about other 7xx fields? I believe as proposed this would be a bit problematic, but maybe we could imagine having a separate "wider ISSN" index? |