| Summary: | A biblio's 'modification history' view confusingly includes info from a unrelated item | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mason James <mtj> | 
| Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Mason James <mtj> | 
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> | 
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | arouss1980, jonathan.druart, severine.queune | 
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: | 
            https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10352 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10680 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12235  | 
      ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | 
| Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
| Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
| Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
| Attachments: | 
              pic-1
               pic-2  | 
      ||
| 
 
        
          Description
        
        
          Mason James
        
        
        
        
          2015-06-24 03:01:36 UTC
        
       
    Hi Mason, can you please add a bit more information? (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > Hi Mason, can you please add a bit more information? yes, sure... pic-1 shows the detail page of bib 65850 pic-2 shows the 'modification log' of bib 65850 notice how in the mod_log page, the information for *item* 65850 is included too, its confusing people Created attachment 40603 [details]
pic-1
    Created attachment 40604 [details]
pic-2
    i guess the easy fix is to pass an extra arg to the script perhaps, tools/viewlog.pl?type=bib or item ? (In reply to Mason James from comment #5) > i guess the easy fix is to pass an extra arg to the script > > perhaps, tools/viewlog.pl?type=bib or item ? hmm.. looking at this again, it seems that the word 'item' is confusingly used as a general descriptor, rather than anything specific to the 'items' table i think it would be less confusing if 'item' was relabelled as 'object' here  |