Summary: | Set only the used fields/subfields | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Pascale Nalon <pascale.nalon> |
Component: | MARC Bibliographic data support | Assignee: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P3 | CC: | jonathan.druart, josef.moravec, tomascohen |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
URL: | http://koha/admin/marc_subfields_structure.pl | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | Small patch |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 6007 | ||
Bug Blocks: | |||
Attachments: |
Screenshot
Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie [PASSED QA] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie |
Description
Chris Cormack
2010-05-21 00:31:02 UTC
this patch seems to not be push in the 3.2 and later versions ? Created attachment 4813 [details]
Screenshot
The display is broken in current master. The information about the tag is missing and there are no links to edit. Wrong column headers.
Katrin, what you describe is Bug 6007. I don't think these two are duplicates, but perhaps this one depends on 6007? Hi Owen, I agree, separate bug depending on this. I have added the display bug as blocker, as it's not possible to test this bug without fixing the display first. Created attachment 37564 [details] [review] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie On the marc framework page, the checkbox to display only used tags/subfields is always unchecked. It should be stored into a cookie to always display the same view. Test plan: 1/ Go on the marc framework page 2/ Check the checkbox 3/ Go somewhere else on the staff interface 4/ Back to the marc framework page, the checkbox should be checked Created attachment 37570 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie On the marc framework page, the checkbox to display only used tags/subfields is always unchecked. It should be stored into a cookie to always display the same view. Test plan: 1/ Go on the marc framework page 2/ Check the checkbox 3/ Go somewhere else on the staff interface 4/ Back to the marc framework page, the checkbox should be checked Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> Created attachment 37571 [details] [review] [SIGNED-OFF] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie On the marc framework page, the checkbox to display only used tags/subfields is always unchecked. It should be stored into a cookie to always display the same view. Test plan: 1/ Go on the marc framework page 2/ Check the checkbox 3/ Go somewhere else on the staff interface 4/ Back to the marc framework page, the checkbox should be checked Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> Created attachment 37657 [details] [review] [PASSED QA] Bug 1487: Store the "display only used tags/subf" value in a cookie On the marc framework page, the checkbox to display only used tags/subfields is always unchecked. It should be stored into a cookie to always display the same view. Test plan: 1/ Go on the marc framework page 2/ Check the checkbox 3/ Go somewhere else on the staff interface 4/ Back to the marc framework page, the checkbox should be checked Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Works as advertised, getting datatables error when using feature but the error exists pre-patch (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #8) > Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> > Works as advertised, getting datatables error when using feature > but the error exists pre-patch You shouldn't see it after bug 6007. Patch pushed to master. Thanks Jonathan! |