Description
Jonathan Druart
2017-01-23 13:13:44 UTC
Created attachment 59450 [details] [review] Bug 17966: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible Here we go, you will notice at the dependency list that this one is a bit different. In our former syntax we have 2 custom tags <checkedout> and <overdue>. These tags were allowed to permit loop on the checked out items and the overdue items. In this patch, we will use the "loops" parameter, introduced by bug 17971, to pass the list of checkouts and overdues to the template. Note that Kyle suggested another approach on bug 15283: all the checkouts were send into the same array and each element of this array calls the is_from_today method, to know if the checkout is an overdue. I don't think we should rely on the Koha API, that's why I suggest to pass 2 differents object list, 1 which contains the checkouts and another one with the overdues. Note that we do rely on the Koha API, we call the Koha::Checkout->item and Koha::Item->biblio to propose an equivalent TT notice. But I think we can accept that. Test plan: Define the ISSUESLIP and ISSUEQSLIP notice templates to generate the same notices you generated with the historical syntax. The patch will not applied cleanly but you can use a version with all conflicts fixed on https://github.com/joubu/Koha/tree/bug_17966 The remove branch has been rebased. Created attachment 63975 [details] [review] Bug 17966: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible Here we go, you will notice at the dependency list that this one is a bit different. In our former syntax we have 2 custom tags <checkedout> and <overdue>. These tags were allowed to permit loop on the checked out items and the overdue items. In this patch, we will use the "loops" parameter, introduced by bug 17971, to pass the list of checkouts and overdues to the template. Note that Kyle suggested another approach on bug 15283: all the checkouts were send into the same array and each element of this array calls the is_from_today method, to know if the checkout is an overdue. I don't think we should rely on the Koha API, that's why I suggest to pass 2 differents object list, 1 which contains the checkouts and another one with the overdues. Note that we do rely on the Koha API, we call the Koha::Checkout->item and Koha::Item->biblio to propose an equivalent TT notice. But I think we can accept that. Test plan: Define the ISSUESLIP and ISSUEQSLIP notice templates to generate the same notices you generated with the historical syntax. Created attachment 65683 [details] [review] Bug 17966: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible Created attachment 66773 [details] [review] Bug 17966: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ISSUESLIP is compatible Here we go, you will notice at the dependency list that this one is a bit different. In our former syntax we have 2 custom tags <checkedout> and <overdue>. These tags were allowed to permit loop on the checked out items and the overdue items. In this patch, we will use the "loops" parameter, introduced by bug 17971, to pass the list of checkouts and overdues to the template. Note that Kyle suggested another approach on bug 15283: all the checkouts were send into the same array and each element of this array calls the is_from_today method, to know if the checkout is an overdue. I don't think we should rely on the Koha API, that's why I suggest to pass 2 differents object list, 1 which contains the checkouts and another one with the overdues. Note that we do rely on the Koha API, we call the Koha::Checkout->item and Koha::Item->biblio to propose an equivalent TT notice. But I think we can accept that. Test plan: Define the ISSUESLIP and ISSUEQSLIP notice templates to generate the same notices you generated with the historical syntax. Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17969 Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com> Pushed to master for 17.11, thanks to everybody involved! Enhancement not pushed to 17.05.x |