Summary: | Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | m.de.rooy, nick |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | Small patch |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 17728 | ||
Attachments: |
Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting
Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting |
Description
Jonathan Druart
2017-09-12 21:33:48 UTC
Created attachment 67117 [details] [review] Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting GetReservesForBranch simply returns the waiting holds, for a specific branch of not. This can easily be replaced with a call to Koha::Holds->waiting To avoid any regressions, I reuse the exact conditions (priority = 0), but I do not think it is useful. Test plan: Make sure the holds information are correctly displayed on the waiting holds screen. Created attachment 67118 [details] [review] Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting GetReservesForBranch simply returns the waiting holds, for a specific branch of not. This can easily be replaced with a call to Koha::Holds->waiting To avoid any regressions, I reuse the exact conditions (priority = 0), but I do not think it is useful. Test plan: Make sure the holds information are correctly displayed on the waiting holds screen. Created attachment 68815 [details] [review] Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting GetReservesForBranch simply returns the waiting holds, for a specific branch of not. This can easily be replaced with a call to Koha::Holds->waiting To avoid any regressions, I reuse the exact conditions (priority = 0), but I do not think it is useful. Test plan: Make sure the holds information are correctly displayed on the waiting holds screen. Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> +# FIXME - Is priority => 0 useful? If yes it must be moved to waiting, otherwise we need to remove it from here. Since set_waiting sets priority to 0, we should not need to check priority again. But the test has been used more often in that way: return 'Waiting' if $found eq 'W' and $priority == 0; IF found is W or T, priority should be 0. Priority is no longer of importance when an item has been set to Waiting. Created attachment 68908 [details] [review] Bug 19299: Replace C4::Reserves::GetReservesForBranch with Koha::Holds->waiting GetReservesForBranch simply returns the waiting holds, for a specific branch of not. This can easily be replaced with a call to Koha::Holds->waiting To avoid any regressions, I reuse the exact conditions (priority = 0), but I do not think it is useful. Test plan: Make sure the holds information are correctly displayed on the waiting holds screen. Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> Pushed to master for 18.05, thanks to everybody involved! Awesome work all! Skipping for 17.11, enhancement. |