Summary: | Link 130 uniform title authority record to 240 tag | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Jess Beno <jbeno> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | flyingendpaper, m.de.rooy, martin.renvoize, verolencinas |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=34025 | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: |
Description
Jess Beno
2017-10-31 22:43:43 UTC
Hi Jess, can you explain a bit more about the link? Where should the link display and where should it link to? Uniform titles in MARC21 field 240 are used if there is a primary access point present. For examples laws use the following combination: 110 $a Canada 240 $a Laws, etc. 245 $a .... Or in literary works: 100 $a Cervantes Saavedra, Miguel de 240 $a Don Quijote de la Mancha 245 $a .... The corresponding authority records should not link to the 240 field directly, but to the 110/240 or 110/240 combination. For the first example the authority record should be: 110 $a Canada $t Laws, etc. and for the second example: 100 $a Cervantes Saavedra, Miguel de $t Don Quijote de la Mancha This means Koha should be able to use one authority field to link to two fields in the bibliographic record. Koha should not use 130 Uniform title authority records to link to 240 fields. |