| Summary: | Replace Record via Z39.50 Server give option to change framework | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Jessie Zairo <jzairo> |
| Component: | Z39.50 / SRU / OpenSearch Servers | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | esther.melander, hc, kelly, m.de.rooy, mnero, nakeli.hendrix |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Jessie Zairo
2017-12-14 18:43:39 UTC
The 'replace' feature brings up the normal Z39.50 search - in which step would you place the framework selection and should/could it apply to normal catalouging as well? Yes. It would be nice to be able to select the framework when importing a new record via z39.50. It would be nice to be able to choose the default framework when importing from Z39.50. We are finding that replacing a record with Z39.50 always uses the default framework, regardless of the original framework of the record. We would like to be able to replace a brief fast add record with a record from z39.50 while still leaving it in the fast add framework. |