| Summary: | Add a selenium script to hit all the pages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
| Component: | Test Suite | Assignee: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
| Status: | In Discussion --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | m.de.rooy, mtj, tomascohen |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 19384 | ||
| Attachments: | Bug 19883: Add a selenium script to hit all the pages | ||
|
Description
Jonathan Druart
2017-12-27 13:01:19 UTC
Created attachment 70170 [details] [review] Bug 19883: Add a selenium script to hit all the pages The idea here would be to catch possible hidden issues, and especially when the requested data do not exist (for instance hit circulation.pl?borrowernumber=42 without borrowernumber=42 in your DB). All these pages must not return 500. This is not ready at all for inclusion for several reasons: - Based on existing data (id=1 most of the time) - DB will be modified - Not idempotent - All pages are not covered (TODO) Even if not included it could be useful for QA or RM Marcel and Tomas, what do you think? It could be a nice goal to see all these scripts handling non-existing data. Nice goal on itself. Protecting the database is obviously needed. Do several scripts need basic parameters at the beginning already (not only what is filled on a form)? So the script needs to know these; could be a maintenance headache? (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #3) > Nice goal on itself. Protecting the database is obviously needed. > Do several scripts need basic parameters at the beginning already (not only > what is filled on a form)? So the script needs to know these; could be a > maintenance headache? I plan to test with GET parameters only. |