Bug 20200

Summary: Show MARC 770 Supplement/Special Issue Entry on detail pages
Product: Koha Reporter: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer>
Component: MARC Bibliographic data supportAssignee: Eugene Espinoza <eugenegf>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low CC: eugenegf, flyingendpaper
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: Bug 20200: Show MARC 770 Supplement/Special Issue Entry on detail pages

Description Katrin Fischer 2018-02-14 17:45:02 UTC
Currently 770 is not shown in Koha on the detail pages. We should add the display of this field.

Examples:
770 08 	
_iAnfangs darin, später selbst.
_aGesellschaft für Verbreitung von Volksbildung
_tJahresbericht der Gesellschaft für Verbreitung von Volksbildung
_dBerlin, 1872
_w015234347

770 08 	
_iBeil. ab 1902
_aDie Volks-Bibliothek
_dBerlin, 1896
_w014944286
Comment 1 Katrin Fischer 2018-02-14 17:46:45 UTC
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd770.html
Comment 2 Eugene Espinoza 2020-08-12 12:57:02 UTC
Created attachment 108101 [details] [review]
Bug 20200: Show MARC 770 Supplement/Special Issue Entry on detail pages

Currently 770 is not shown in Koha on the detail pages. We should add the display of this field.

To test:
1) Edit your framework of choice, edit field 770's subfields iatdw's visibility. Make it visible in editor.
2) Edit a record using the framework just edited, add values into field 770 subfield iatdw.
3) Save the record.
4) View the record in OPAC.
5) The fields won't be visible in the OPAC.
6) Apply patch.
7) Refresh OPAC.
8) Fields are now visible in the OPAC.
Comment 3 Eugene Espinoza 2022-09-22 14:41:36 UTC
I checked on current iteration of Koha ILS, it seems this has been addressed. Katrin, can this be confirmed?
Comment 4 Katrin Fischer 2022-11-16 23:37:40 UTC
(In reply to Eugene Espinoza from comment #3)
> I checked on current iteration of Koha ILS, it seems this has been
> addressed. Katrin, can this be confirmed?

Yes, i can confirm :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 15141 ***