Summary: | MARC detail view may show field header info erroneously | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | paxed <pasi.kallinen> |
Component: | Templates | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | minor | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | ere.maijala |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: |
Description
paxed
2018-10-26 08:00:50 UTC
Whoops. Missed the 650 from the example... 4) Go to that record's MARC detail view. In the 6xx tab, you will see three separate entries for 655 fields: 655 $a foo 655 $a baz 650 $a qwerty 655 $a qux $a quux How it should look: 650 $a qwerty 655 $a foo $a baz $a qux $a quux ... I'd argue the fields should be shown in numerical order... I am not sure if that is always the wanted behavior (to sort and group them). I have learned that sequence in MARC can have a meaning and sometimes people reorder on purpose. Might need some of the MARC21 catalogers to weigh in. I feel the current display is correct, as it reflects the MARC record exactly. Any changes would likely cause more confusion than being of any help. |