Summary: | Replace duplicated code in CanBookBeRenewed with GetSoonestRenewDate | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | David Cook <dcook> |
Component: | Circulation | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | gmcharlt, hayleypelham, janet.mcgowan, josef.moravec, kyle.m.hall, nick, wizzyrea |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19014 |
||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: | Bug 22333: Replace duplicated code in CanBookBeRenewed with GetSoonestRenewDate |
Description
David Cook
2019-02-14 04:38:52 UTC
Created attachment 85074 [details] [review] Bug 22333: Replace duplicated code in CanBookBeRenewed with GetSoonestRenewDate This patch replaces some duplicated code in CanBookBeRenewed by using the GetSoonestRenewDate function. This patch also refactors some of the auto_renew logic in CanBookBeRenewed, so that it's more readable/maintainable. I don't have a formal test plan yet, since it's a fiddly bit of code and I have other things to do, but I wanted to share the change anyway. (In reply to David Cook from comment #2) > I don't have a formal test plan yet, since it's a fiddly bit of code and I > have other things to do, but I wanted to share the change anyway. I think run test t/db_dependent/Circulation.t could be fine test plan here ;) (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #3) > (In reply to David Cook from comment #2) > > I don't have a formal test plan yet, since it's a fiddly bit of code and I > > have other things to do, but I wanted to share the change anyway. > > I think run test t/db_dependent/Circulation.t could be fine test plan here ;) I'm happy to go with that if you are! Test fails with the following error: t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 122/126 # No tests run! t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 123/126 # Failed test 'No tests run for subtest "AddRenewal and AddIssuingCharge tests"' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 2948. Can't call method "lengthunit" on an undefined value at /home/vagrant/kohaclone/Koha/Charges/Fees.pm line 101. # Looks like your test exited with 11 just after 123. t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. Dubious, test returned 11 (wstat 2816, 0xb00) Failed 4/126 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t/db_dependent/Circulation.t (Wstat: 2816 Tests: 123 Failed: 1) Failed test: 123 Non-zero exit status: 11 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 123. Files=1, Tests=123, 38 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.01 sys + 18.59 cusr 3.22 csys = 21.89 CPU) Result: FAIL (In reply to Hayley Mapley from comment #5) > Test fails with the following error: > > t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 122/126 # No tests run! > t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 123/126 > # Failed test 'No tests run for subtest "AddRenewal and AddIssuingCharge > tests"' > # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 2948. > Can't call method "lengthunit" on an undefined value at > /home/vagrant/kohaclone/Koha/Charges/Fees.pm line 101. > # Looks like your test exited with 11 just after 123. > t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. Dubious, test returned 11 (wstat 2816, 0xb00) > Failed 4/126 subtests > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > t/db_dependent/Circulation.t (Wstat: 2816 Tests: 123 Failed: 1) > Failed test: 123 > Non-zero exit status: 11 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 126 tests but ran 123. > Files=1, Tests=123, 38 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.01 sys + 18.59 cusr > 3.22 csys = 21.89 CPU) > Result: FAIL Thanks, Hayley! I'm guessing this highlights a problem with that test rather than this patch though. Hmm. What are your thoughts, Tomas? I'm going to reset this one to needs signoff, as I think the problem is with the tests rather than the patch. Hi David, I got test failures too, as follows, have a look? Liz # Failed test 'Bug 14101: Cannot renew, renewal is automatic (returned code is auto_renew)' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 601. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Failed test 'Cannot renew, renew is automatic' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 643. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Failed test 'Cannot renew, renew is automatic' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 661. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 14. # Failed test 'too_late_renewal / no_auto_renewal_after' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 662. # Failed test 'Can auto renew, OPACFineNoRenewals=10, patron has 5' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 695. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Failed test 'Can auto renew, OPACFineNoRenewals=10, patron has 10' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 708. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 6. t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 60/125 # Failed test 'auto_too_much_oweing | OPACFineNoRenewalsBlockAutoRenew' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 724. # Failed test 'Can auto renew, patron is expired but BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions=0' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 750. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Failed test 'Can auto renew, BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions=1 but patron is not expired' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 774. # got: 'auto_too_soon' # expected: 'auto_renew' # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 6. # Failed test 'auto_account_expired | BlockExpiredPatronOpacActions' # at t/db_dependent/Circulation.t line 776. t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. 125/125 # Looks like you failed 4 tests of 125. t/db_dependent/Circulation.t .. Dubious, test returned 4 (wstat 1024, 0x400) Failed 4/125 subtests Test Summary Report ------------------- t/db_dependent/Circulation.t (Wstat: 1024 Tests: 125 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 58-61 Non-zero exit status: 4 Files=1, Tests=125, 36 wallclock secs ( 0.11 usr 0.01 sys + 25.60 cusr 4.60 csys = 30.32 CPU) Result: FAIL (In reply to Liz Rea from comment #8) > Hi David, > > I got test failures too, as follows, have a look? > > Liz > Ahhh thanks for that output. I'll take a look when I have a moment. I have too many other priorities, so I'm probably not going to be looking at this any time soon. I think this has been addressed elsewhere and can be closed *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29474 *** |