Summary: | Remove utf8 as an export option | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Aleisha Amohia <aleisha> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | David Roberts <david.roberts> |
Status: | CLOSED INVALID | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | david.roberts, m.de.rooy |
Version: | Main | Keywords: | Academy |
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: |
Description
Aleisha Amohia
2020-01-14 23:57:53 UTC
There are three MARC options: MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) I'm not sure what the difference between Unicode and Unicode Standard are, but it seems sensible to keep at least one of these. In order for compatibility with other systems, it seems most practical to keep a non-unicode and a unicode export, but I'm happy to take advice on this. Hm, I am not sure if Aleisha meant the download/export options for records or not. Aleisha, can you clarify?
> MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8)
> MARC (Unicode/UTF-8)
> MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard)
>
> I'm not sure what the difference between Unicode and Unicode Standard are,
> but it seems sensible to keep at least one of these.
Standard doesn't include the non-standard 9xx $9 x9x, xx9 custom fields :)
I believe all available options produce different formats/output, so this might be invalid. The internal naming could probably be improved. |