| Summary: | Merge bib records - rebuild Zebra | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Fiona Borthwick <fiona.borthwick> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer> |
| Status: | RESOLVED MOVED | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | ||
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Fiona Borthwick
2020-08-25 09:41:28 UTC
I believe this might have been badly phrased not meaning "full reindex", but the normal incremental one. And maybe dating back to times where this was not done by the indexer (almost immediately), but could take up to a view minutes? I think I'd just delete the part about the importance of indexing - every change requires an index to take effect in search and deleting of records is not different to a merge... pointing it out here explicitly doesn't seem necessary. What do you think? (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > I believe this might have been badly phrased not meaning "full reindex", but > the normal incremental one. And maybe dating back to times where this was > not done by the indexer (almost immediately), but could take up to a view > minutes? > > I think I'd just delete the part about the importance of indexing - every > change requires an index to take effect in search and deleting of records is > not different to a merge... pointing it out here explicitly doesn't seem > necessary. What do you think? I agree Katrin! I've submitted a merge request to the manual for this change. |