Bug 29972

Summary: The "select a specific item" table on opac-reserve.tt should be column configurable
Product: Koha Reporter: Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas>
Component: OPACAssignee: Lucas Gass (lukeg) <lucas>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: P5 - low    
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: Small patch
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Bug Depends on: 29899    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments: Bug 29972: Make the select a specific item table configurable on opac-reserve.tt

Description Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2022-01-28 21:09:22 UTC
When you select a specific item on opac-reserve.tt there is a table which is not cannot be configured via Table settings, it would be nice if it could be.
Comment 1 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2022-01-28 22:10:31 UTC
Created attachment 129960 [details] [review]
Bug 29972: Make the select a specific item table configurable on opac-reserve.tt

To test:
1. Apply patch and restart everything
2. Find a record that was multiple items on it, place a hold on that item.
3. On the "Placing hold" page, click "Show more options" and "A specific
  item."
4. See that the table can now be sorted by each column, make sure the sorting works
5. Go to Administration > Table settings, and in the OPAC section find reserves_table
6. Try hiding some columns and then do step 3 again.
7. Confirm the columns are properly being hidden.
Comment 2 Katrin Fischer 2022-01-29 22:43:50 UTC
It feels like this is a possible (partial) duplicate to bug 29713. Should we close the other in favor of this?
Comment 3 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2022-01-31 14:38:25 UTC
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2)
> It feels like this is a possible (partial) duplicate to bug 29713. Should we
> close the other in favor of this?

I would consider this one the duplicate, marking it as so.
Comment 4 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2022-01-31 14:39:04 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29713 ***