Bug 30210

Summary: Fix typos in cpanfile
Product: Koha Reporter: Mason James <mtj>
Component: PackagingAssignee: Mason James <mtj>
Status: CLOSED INVALID QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: normal    
Priority: P5 - low CC: julian.maurice, mtj
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
GIT URL: Initiative type: ---
Sponsorship status: --- Comma delimited list of Sponsors:
Crowdfunding goal: 0 Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: Bug 30210: Fix typos in cpanfile

Description Mason James 2022-03-02 04:35:42 UTC
this patch fixes typos in cpanfile
Comment 1 Mason James 2022-03-02 04:39:18 UTC
Created attachment 131225 [details] [review]
Bug 30210: Fix typos in cpanfile

to test...
 - apply patch
 - confirm updated versions display correctly in about.pl page
Comment 2 Julian Maurice 2022-03-02 07:01:22 UTC
Are they typos ? According to https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid.
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2022-03-06 11:48:50 UTC
Dotted-integer versions

    Dotted-integer (also known as dotted-decimal) versions consist of positive integers separated by full stop characters (i.e. "dots", "periods" or "decimal points"). This are equivalent in format to Perl "v-strings", with some additional restrictions on form. They must be given in "normal" form, which has a leading "v" character and at least three integer components. To retain a one-to-one mapping with decimal versions, all components after the first should be restricted to the range 0 to 999. The final component may be separated by an underscore character instead of a period.


Mason, maybe you can clarify?
Comment 4 Mason James 2022-03-08 23:42:48 UTC
(In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #2)
> Are they typos ? According to
> https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid.

hi Julian
you are correct, they are technically not typos :)

i will rename the bug to a more accurate title
Comment 5 Mason James 2022-03-09 04:26:37 UTC
(In reply to Mason James from comment #4)
> (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #2)
> > Are they typos ? According to
> > https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid.
> 
> hi Julian
> you are correct, they are technically not typos :)

ahh, i see the "typos" are actually the correct format

ill close the bug