| Summary: | Fix typos in cpanfile | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mason James <mtj> |
| Component: | Packaging | Assignee: | Mason James <mtj> |
| Status: | CLOSED INVALID | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | julian.maurice, mtj |
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
| Attachments: | Bug 30210: Fix typos in cpanfile | ||
|
Description
Mason James
2022-03-02 04:35:42 UTC
Created attachment 131225 [details] [review] Bug 30210: Fix typos in cpanfile to test... - apply patch - confirm updated versions display correctly in about.pl page Are they typos ? According to https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid. Dotted-integer versions
Dotted-integer (also known as dotted-decimal) versions consist of positive integers separated by full stop characters (i.e. "dots", "periods" or "decimal points"). This are equivalent in format to Perl "v-strings", with some additional restrictions on form. They must be given in "normal" form, which has a leading "v" character and at least three integer components. To retain a one-to-one mapping with decimal versions, all components after the first should be restricted to the range 0 to 999. The final component may be separated by an underscore character instead of a period.
Mason, maybe you can clarify?
(In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #2) > Are they typos ? According to > https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid. hi Julian you are correct, they are technically not typos :) i will rename the bug to a more accurate title (In reply to Mason James from comment #4) > (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #2) > > Are they typos ? According to > > https://metacpan.org/pod/CPAN::Meta::Spec#Version-Formats they seem valid. > > hi Julian > you are correct, they are technically not typos :) ahh, i see the "typos" are actually the correct format ill close the bug |