Summary: | Correct path for cookie bibs_selected | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy> |
Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | victor, wainuiwitikapark |
Version: | 20.11 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | Trivial patch |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: |
19.11.28,20.11.18
|
|
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: | Bug 30296: [20.11.x] Set path for bibs_selected |
Description
Marcel de Rooy
2022-03-15 13:23:01 UTC
Created attachment 131717 [details] [review] Bug 30296: [20.11.x] Set path for bibs_selected Or it does not get cleared. Not that we may want to skip it for master as bug 29932 is going to replace it with sessionStorage Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl> No longer needed too on 21.11 and 21.05. RM and RMaints: Please push this forward for 20.11 and/or lower. NOT for 21.11 or 21.05 How should this be tested? In staff search results, ticking multiples records and placing a hold works even with setContextBiblioNumbers empty so it doesn't seem to be the right workflow that makes use of that function. I need to backport this to 19.11.x right? (In reply to wainuiwitikapark from comment #4) > I need to backport this to 19.11.x right? Yes 20.11 and lower Backported to 19.11.x > How should this be tested?
Doesn't sound too risky. So:
Backported: Pushed to 20.11.x branch for 20.11.17
For 20.11.18 actually. |