Summary: | ShowComponentRecords doesn't display components if UseControlNumber is turned on | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | m.de.rooy, magnus |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=30327 | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Bug Depends on: | 11175 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Caroline Cyr La Rose
2022-09-22 19:54:06 UTC
Hi Caroline, same issue with Elasticsearch/Zebra? (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #1) > Hi Caroline, same issue with Elasticsearch/Zebra? I did this with ES on my local installation and with Zebra on a BW sandbox. Hi Caroline, do you still happen to know were you were testing? If it was an updated installation, the cnr index might have been missing as it's not added on update for Elasticsearch. So the question then is perhaps if this was never implemented with UseControlNumber, or if it was implemented and some bug snuck in and made it not work any more? In t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio.t there is a set of subtests labeled "get_components_query", which seems to be testing with UseControlNumber both off and on. And the tests pass. The original bug 11175 has this patch: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=126882 "Taking the code in bug 15851 as inspiration this patch also adds proper handling for UseControlNumber vs EasyAnalytics style 773 linking and ensures we only return analytic component parts and no other records containing 773's." Sounds to me like it should work. I'm changing this from "enh" to "normal bug". It should work if a library is using control-numbers for linking, I am pretty sure I tested this. Needs some more testing I think to see where the problem is. @Caroline: did you check on the existence of the cnr index in your installation? |