Summary: | Indefinite debarments should not be recorded with an expiration date of '9999-12-31' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Andrew Fuerste-Henry <andrew> |
Component: | Patrons | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | gmcharlt, kyle.m.hall, magnus |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 11846 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Andrew Fuerste-Henry
2022-11-30 21:27:28 UTC
To widen the scope of this a bit, we could perhaps consider if it makes sense to record debarments/restrictions both in the borrowers table, and in the dedicated borrower_debarments table? Would it not make more sense to have them only in the borrower_debarments table, since there can be multiple debarments per patron? |