Bug 34053

Summary: Text in holdings table gets wrapped on mobile, breaking words and decreasing readability
Product: Koha Reporter: Wainui Witika-Park <wainuiwitikapark>
Component: OPACAssignee: Wainui Witika-Park <wainuiwitikapark>
Status: In Discussion --- QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: minor    
Priority: P5 - low CC: aleisha, dcook, lucas
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
GIT URL: Change sponsored?: Sponsored
Patch complexity: --- Documentation contact:
Documentation submission: Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments: Bug 34053: Fixing overlapping in holdings table

Description Wainui Witika-Park 2023-06-19 04:33:51 UTC
To replicate -

1. Go to opac
2. Do a search in the catalogue
3. Go to a record
4. Go down to the "Holdings" table
5. Scroll in, notice the text overlaps
Comment 1 Wainui Witika-Park 2023-06-19 04:49:44 UTC
Created attachment 152460 [details] [review]
Bug 34053: Fixing overlapping in holdings table

To see initial issue:
    1) Go to opac
    2) Do a search in the catalogue
    3) Go to a record
    4) Go down to the "Holdings" table
    5) Scroll in, notice the text overlaps

To test fix:
    1) Backport patch
    2) Build the OPAC CSS from the updated SCSS ("yarn build" on ktd)
    3) Go to opac
    4) Do a search in the catalogue
    5) Go to a record
    6) Go down to the "Holdings" table
    7) Scroll in, notice the text no longer overlaps

    Sponsored-by: Ministry for Primary Industries | NZ Government
Comment 2 Owen Leonard 2023-08-31 18:06:36 UTC
Now that we have the DataTables responsive plugin on this table I wonder if we can't remove the entire custom style from #holdingst?
Comment 3 David Cook 2023-09-06 00:59:38 UTC
(In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #2)
> Now that we have the DataTables responsive plugin on this table I wonder if
> we can't remove the entire custom style from #holdingst?

Sounds like that's worth a try.
Comment 4 Lucas Gass (lukeg) 2024-01-09 20:58:22 UTC
This looks to be solved by Bug 32341. Should we still use this bug to remove the custom style Owen mentioned?