Summary: | Add --branchcode to writeoff_debts.pl | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose> |
Component: | Command-line Utilities | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | martin.renvoize, philippe.blouin, robin |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Bug Depends on: | 27049 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Caroline Cyr La Rose
2023-06-21 14:13:08 UTC
So.. for clarification.. you mean the library the charge was recorded at.. not the patrons library or the checkouts library or... right? It would be simple enough to filter on the branchcode as recorded in the accountlines table.. I just wanted to clarify that's what you want.. not the branchcodes from various related tables? (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #1) > So.. for clarification.. you mean the library the charge was recorded at.. > not the patrons library or the checkouts library or... right? > > It would be simple enough to filter on the branchcode as recorded in the > accountlines table.. I just wanted to clarify that's what you want.. not the > branchcodes from various related tables? In my specific case, with independentbranches, I think all branchcodes would be the same since patrons and items can't travel between branches. I was going to say that using the branchcode from accountlines would be fine, but it seems it's not recorded for overdue fines? Unless I'm doing something wrong... I added fines in the circ rules, issues an item to a patron with a due date in the past, ran fines.pl, checked accountlines.branchcode and it's NULL. |