Summary: | wrong information about use of 942 in unimarc | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED INVALID | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | ||
Version: | 23.05 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: |
Description
Mathieu Saby
2023-08-18 16:08:06 UTC
The wiki page linked doesn't have any information about 942 use in MARC21, so I think the information about UNIMARC missing there is not really saying much. I think the important bit would be verifying the mappings in the default UNIMARC frameworks as they are shipped with Koha now and the default indexing. Indeed you are right Koha/installer/data/mysql/en/marcflavour/unimarc/mandatory/unimarc_framework_DEFAULT.sql defines 942$0 : 'Koha issues (borrowed), all copies' 942$2 : 'Source of classification or shelving scheme' 942$6 : 'Koha normalized classification for sorting' 942$c : 'Koha item type' 942$s : 'Serial record flag' But the french version only defines 942$0 Koha/installer/data/mysql/fr-FR/marcflavour/unimarc_complet/Obligatoire /framework_DEFAULT.sql The other fields (Koha item type...) are in 099 And french vendors (at least Biblibre) use their own templates based on the fr-FR template. I wonder why french people have used 099 instead of 942 I'm writing to the french community to know more about this divergence There is no issue in the manual. I close the bug |