Summary: | Deleting a patron doesn't use AnonymusPatron to anonymize the circulation history | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Noémie Labine <noemie.labine> |
Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: |
Description
Noémie Labine
2023-11-13 14:26:13 UTC
It will be used when a patron or library decides to anonymize the history (patron privacy settings). Why do you think anonymous would make more sense than null? Or are the whole lines/entries gone? No, the entries are not gone, but to me it would make more sens to group all of the old issues that don't have a patron anymore (because of anonymization or deletion) under the AnonymousPatron's name so that if they look at their stats or in the circulation history of a document, they don't have null entries AND entries under the AnonymousPatron's name. If they use an SQL query to look at their old issues and they group the issues using different borrower's criterias, they would have a null entry and then an entry for the AnonymousPatron. It would just be more user-friendly I think. |