| Summary: | Default framework should not include 856 $k and needs correct label for $l | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Esther Melander <esther.melander> |
| Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | critical | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | m.de.rooy |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Esther Melander
2023-12-13 18:51:23 UTC
Hi Esther, as we cannot tell what customizations libraries have made to their frameworks we have decided not to update frameworks in existing installations on update. But we have updated the frameworks. Please note that $k was indeed a valid subfield until 2020: $k - Password [OBSOLETE, 2020] If you take a look at a new installation and the default frameworks there, you'll see that they have been updated (with 23.11). $k has been marked as [OBSOLETE] $l has been renamed to "Standardized information governing access" If we removed/deleted subfields, we'd risk that the libraries are using data they have stored there. ... we have updated the frameworks for new installations (missed a few words there) Since this has been fixed, we can probably mark this as resolved? Yes, we can. We were quite behind with the MARC updates, but thankfully Caroline made sure we caught up for 23.11 at least. |