Bug 3684

Summary: MARC21 default framework, missing tag
Product: Koha Reporter: Paul Poulain <paul.poulain>
Component: MARC Bibliographic data supportAssignee: Nicole C. Engard <nengard>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Bugs List <koha-bugs>
Severity: minor    
Priority: P5 - low CC: chris
Version: Main   
Hardware: PC   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Description Chris Cormack 2010-05-21 01:13:42 UTC


---- Reported by paul.poulain@biblibre.com 2009-10-01 08:45:54 ----

in MARC21 default structure, the 542 is not defined (it's a recent addition): 
Field 542 - Information Relating to Copyright Status [NEW, 2008]
http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd542.html



--- Bug imported by chris@bigballofwax.co.nz 2010-05-21 01:13 UTC  ---

This bug was previously known as _bug_ 3684 at http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3684

Actual time not defined. Setting to 0.0

Comment 1 Paul Poulain 2011-08-02 14:14:18 UTC
Nicole, could you check if it's still relevant ? Submitting a patch would be wonderfull, of course ;)
Comment 2 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-05 00:22:20 UTC
I'm confused by this bug?  Anyone can add anything to their frameworks, why do we need a patch to add this field to the default?
Comment 3 Paul Poulain 2011-08-05 07:27:52 UTC
Nicole, you're right. But if 542 is now public, maybe it's worth adding it to the default framework new installs upload during installation
Comment 4 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-05 11:53:08 UTC
Okay, that said, I'm not sure why it's assigned to me, this isn't the kind of thing I usually write patches for.  Resetting to the default assignee.

Nicole
Comment 5 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-05 11:53:49 UTC
Hmmm, apparently I am the default, which is very confusing to me.  I never volunteered to be the default for this category .... anyone may take this on.

Nicole
Comment 6 Chris Cormack 2012-10-17 06:50:55 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 5858 ***