Bug 37306

Summary: KBART print ISBN and ISSN should be imported in 776 (marc21) and 452 (unimarc)
Product: Koha Reporter: Mathieu Saby <mathsabypro>
Component: ERMAssignee: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Testopia <testopia>
Severity: minor    
Priority: P5 - low CC: jonathan.druart, jonathan.field, martin.renvoize, matt.blenkinsop, pedro.amorim
Version: Main   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Change sponsored?: --- Patch complexity: ---
Documentation contact: Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Description Mathieu Saby 2024-07-10 13:21:04 UTC
From https://koha-community.org/manual/latest/fr/html/erm.html#import-from-kbart-label I believe Print isbn is imported in 020 in MARC21

This is not the standard way to map Kbart to MARC21. Even if I don't know if there is is an official mapping, you can take as an example the mapping of this provider : print isbn is going to 776z

https://marc-openedition.readthedocs.io/en/latest/marc21.html#books

for unimarc it should be 452y

https://marc-openedition.readthedocs.io/en/latest/unimarc.html#books

you can also see this example from Springer : 
https://metadata.springernature.com/api/metadata?eisbn=978-3-030-54602-1&format=MARCxml
They add a 776$i "Printed edition" before the 776$z

And the mapping used by Clarivate in Alma https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Content/For_Content_Providers/Enrichment


The same logic applies to ISSN : print ISSN should be in 776$x in Marc21, 452$x in unimarc
Comment 1 Mathieu Saby 2024-07-10 15:01:29 UTC
I wrongly described those references, which are not, strictly speaking, mappings between KBART and MARC, but rules for describing e-resources in MARC.

Anyway, I still believe it would be better not to put print isbn and issn in 020 or 022 field