| Summary: | Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | José Anjos <joseanjos> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | alexander.wagner, aude.charillon, philip.orr |
| Version: | 24.05 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
José Anjos
2024-08-29 09:41:19 UTC
Thank you for pointing this out. If you were looking for information regarding those fields, I would advise to trust the Manual. This section of the Manual was last updated 2 years ago, whereas the one in the Wiki page was updated in 2015. The Wiki page does also say: "Until now only a proposal (not in the code)" and references Koha version 3.2, which is positively ancient in Koha terms. I will check with some UNIMARC users that the Manual section is correct. We just had a discussion on the Koha community Mattermost (big thanks to Mathieu Saby) which confirms the following: - the Wiki page is out of date. - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 and later. (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #2) > - the Wiki page is out of date. > - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. > These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 > and later. Is there a canonical way to mark it in the wiki as outdated and refer to the manual section? (Just as I based our migration procedures mainly on the wiki as I obviously didn't notice the chapter in the manual.) (In reply to Alexander Wagner from comment #3) > (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #2) > > > - the Wiki page is out of date. > > - the Manual is correct. It looks like it was updated following bug 30373. > > These field values are used in any new Koha installations at version 22.05 > > and later. > > Is there a canonical way to mark it in the wiki as outdated and refer to the > manual section? > > (Just as I based our migration procedures mainly on the wiki as I obviously > didn't notice the chapter in the manual.) We should definitely do that. Something like this with a link to the manual maybe? https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Discharge_RFC Thanks, that's a nice example. I've added that https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) (In reply to Aude Charillon from comment #5) > Thanks, that's a nice example. I've added that > https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Holdings_data_fields_(9xx) Awesome, thanks Aude! |