Summary: | Notes scrubber is too strict for some cases | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Lisette Scheer <lisette> |
Component: | Architecture, internals, and plumbing | Assignee: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | dcook |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38960 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31165 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38498 |
||
GIT URL: | 33337 | Change sponsored?: | --- |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
Bug Depends on: | 31165 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Lisette Scheer
2025-08-27 21:47:25 UTC
*** Bug 38498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I opened bug 38498 a while ago to add "id" and "class", but this makes a lot of sense too in terms of attributes. As for the "a" element... I think we'll want to be careful. I created the "note" profile to be re-usable for other types of notes. If it's staff-created notes, it's probably fine. If it's user-created notes, then there's some danger. Btw in this case, I don't think we'd need the "property", "typeof", or "resource" attributes, since those are specific to Schema.org for the record display. |