| Summary: | Use library-specific RENEWAL notice when renewing in the OPAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Aude Charillon <aude.charillon> |
| Component: | Notices | Assignee: | Martin Renvoize (ashimema) <martin.renvoize> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | martin.renvoize |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
|
Description
Aude Charillon
2025-10-07 14:17:52 UTC
I am not sure how the library is currently picked when a library-specific notice is sent for staff interface renewals. OPAC renewals should probably follow the same logic - or use the library set in OpacRenewalBranch. |