| Summary: | Possible grammar mistake: ... following {kohafield} do not have a value... | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer> |
| Component: | Templates | Assignee: | Owen Leonard <oleonard> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Testopia <testopia> |
| Severity: | trivial | ||
| Priority: | P5 - low | ||
| Version: | Main | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| GIT URL: | Initiative type: | --- | |
| Sponsorship status: | --- | Comma delimited list of Sponsors: | |
| Crowdfunding goal: | 0 | Patch complexity: | --- |
| Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
| Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
| Circulation function: | |||
I've stumbled on this while translating: Koha/Database/DataInconsistency.pm:349 The Framework *{frameworkcode}* is using the authorised value's category *{av_category}*, but the following {kohafield} do not have a value defined ({itemnumber => value }): {output} I wonder if it should be "does not have", but also if {kohafield} makes sense when it's replaced with the value.