Summary: | 006 field missing critical values | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Nicole C. Engard <nengard> |
Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | PATCH-Sent (DO NOT USE) | CC: | chris, cnighswonger, jcamins, jwagner, koha.sekjal |
Version: | Main | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5196 | ||
GIT URL: | Change sponsored?: | --- | |
Patch complexity: | --- | Documentation contact: | |
Documentation submission: | Text to go in the release notes: | ||
Version(s) released in: | Circulation function: | ||
Attachments: | patch |
Description
Nicole C. Engard
2010-09-02 23:56:40 UTC
Created attachment 2600 [details] [review] patch This is a partial patch that only addresses the missing values from the 00 subfield of the 006 field. I will open another bug for the additional missing values since I'm not sure I know how to resolve an issue where the contents of the subfields are all determined by the choice made in the 00 subfield. new bug 5196 reported for the rest of this bug: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5196 Does this patch apply for Bug 3013? If so, that would just leave the 008 as needing to be fixed. No, this is not related. These were missing values from the 006 - not values that were missing because of a selection made by the user. See bug 5096 for that (that bug is related). (In reply to comment #4) > No, this is not related. These were missing values from the 006 - not values > that were missing because of a selection made by the user. See bug 5096 for > that (that bug is related). Sorry - I meant bug 5196. Can this be closed? It looks like this patch has been pushed to head. This does not appear to have been pushed either to a QA branch or to master. It was signed off on, however, so I'm changing the patch status to reflect that. Also note that the subject line of the patch includes a mistype of the bug number as 5159 rather than 5195. Maybe I should have rephrased that - the missing values are in master now - not sure if it came in through the patch or not - but the bug no longer exists. I'm pretty sure this was pushed. Nicole, this is your bug, so you're the one to close it. :) It seems fixed to me on latest Master, though, for what it's worth. (In reply to comment #9) > I'm pretty sure this was pushed. Nicole, this is your bug, so you're the one to > close it. :) It seems fixed to me on latest Master, though, for what it's > worth. I'm not suggesting that this bug is still valid, but this patch was not pushed according to the history of this file: http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=history;f=koha-tmpl/intranet-tmpl/prog/en/modules/cataloguing/value_builder/marc21_field_006.tmpl;h=2b90f48155b617f526e08d1b3cace6613f05ed42;hb=HEAD Perhaps this bug is a duplicate of bug 3013... Okey Dokey - closing :) |