Summary: | The serial claims dropdown shows suppliers that don't have late issues. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Frédérick Capovilla <fcapovilla> |
Component: | Serials | Assignee: | Frédérick Capovilla <fcapovilla> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | PATCH-Sent (DO NOT USE) | CC: | colin.campbell, paul.poulain |
Version: | rel_3_2 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: | Corrects GetSuppliersWithLateIssues |
Description
Frédérick Capovilla
2011-05-18 17:34:07 UTC
Signed off - patch applies to 3.2 behaviour as in 3.4 QA comment Patch does not apply. It appears that the problem has already been fixed by 63a8c5bc9df7585ac4e5796e9f1a62f25f52ebb0 from hdl, 2010-11-01 MT3801 followup : Cannot claim for issues signed-off by Colin I've also checked 3.4.3, it's also already applied. I've checked 3.4.2 and 3.4.1, and it's the same thing = already applied. Colin / Frédérick = could you confirm please and mark "RESOLVED FIXED", or give me directions. For now, marking "does not apply" Patch is for 3.2.x only see my earlier comment it applies a fix similar to that already in the 3.4 release OK, I misunderstood your comment (my average english...): patch applies to 3.2 behaviour as in 3.4 => undestood patch applies to 3.2 behaviour, as in 3.4 (which means nothing probably) instead of patch applies to 3.2, behaviour as in 3.4 (which I failed to understand) 3.2 is now unsupported, so marking "RESO WONTFIX" |