Bug 6662

Summary:	sort options in opac are dewey specific
Product:	Koha	Reporter:	Nicole C. Engard <nengard>
Component:	Templates	Assignee:	Nicole C. Engard <nengard>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:	Bugs List <koha-bugs>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	PATCH-Sent (DO NOT USE)	CC:	chris, koha.sekjal
Version:	Main
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Change sponsored?:	---	Patch complexity:	---
Documentation contact:		Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:		Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:
Attachments:	call number sort text Bug 6662: Remove Dewey Specific References in Sort Signed-off patch

Description Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-02 16:01:27 UTC

When you pull down the sort menu on the opac search results or advanced search, the call number search option gives a dewey specific hint (0-9 non fiction a-z fiction).  This is not the case in all libraries or all classifications. Is it possible to remove this tip from the pull down or make it specific to the classification chosen in the sys prefs (removing being the easier option of course).

[I thought I had reported this before, but can't find it - so sorry if it's a duplicate]

Comment 1 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-02 16:02:17 UTC

Created attachment 4812 [details]
call number sort text

Comment 2 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-02 16:07:42 UTC

Another option is to just remove fiction and non-fiction and say "0-9 to A-Z" if the tip is necessary - just removing the Dewey specific bits is helpful.

Nicole

Comment 3 Nicole C. Engard 2011-08-24 12:20:29 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)

Created attachment 5112 [details] [review]
Bug 6662: Remove Dewey Specific References in Sort

The sort option used to include tooltips for call number
that were Dewey specific.   This patch removes references
to Fiction and Nonfiction so that it can apply to any
classification.

Comment 4 Owen Leonard 2011-08-24 12:27:29 UTC

Created attachment 5113 [details] [review]
Signed-off patch

Comment 5 Ian Walls 2011-08-25 23:24:14 UTC

Template only change, easy to read, marking as Passed QA

Comment 6 Chris Cormack 2011-08-26 19:57:18 UTC

Pushed, please test

Comment 7 Chris Nighswonger 2011-10-26 18:02:34 UTC

The fix for this bug was published in the 3.4.5 release. If you were the reporter of this bug, please take time to verify the fix and update the status of this bug report accordingly. If the bug is fixed to your satisfaction, please close this report.