Summary: | Capture member signature | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Savitra Sirohi <savitra.sirohi> |
Component: | Patrons | Assignee: | Amit Gupta <kohapatch> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Bugs List <koha-bugs> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | cbrannon, dcook, gmcharlt, katrin.fischer, kohapatch, veron |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: |
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33985 |
||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: |
Description
Savitra Sirohi
2011-08-30 09:02:09 UTC
We can upload files related to patrons ( cgi-bin/koha/members/files.pl?borrowernumber=nnnnn ) This way, e.g. signed and scanned contracts could be uploaded. There has not been any comment on this in 8 years, is this still a feature that would be needed? This would be a good feature. A general import document feature that would link the uploaded document to the patron account, and list it somewhere on the patron checkout/details page, in a tab. (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #3) > This would be a good feature. A general import document feature that would > link the uploaded document to the patron account Isn't this what EnableBorrowerFiles controls? I had left this open, because I thought there might be a way to automate the pad to image file a bit - but thinking about, I am not sure it would be wise to just store a patrons signature without the contents of the signed document? Thinking if this could be abused - not sure how those terminals work in general. (In reply to Owen Leonard from comment #4) > (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #3) > > This would be a good feature. A general import document feature that would > > link the uploaded document to the patron account > > Isn't this what EnableBorrowerFiles controls? Well, how about that? Didn't even know that was there. I think that works pretty darn good, although, it would be nice if there was a view feature, so you don't have to download the file to view it (if it is just an image). (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #5) > I had left this open, because I thought there might be a way to automate the > pad to image file a bit - but thinking about, I am not sure it would be wise > to just store a patrons signature without the contents of the signed > document? Thinking if this could be abused - not sure how those terminals > work in general. I think that the risk seems higher than the reward in my opinion. I wouldn't want my library system storing my signature in an Internet facing system. If I knew that my library was doing that, I'd probably stop using that library. Curious what the GDPR requirements would be as well. |