Summary: | Z39.50 client should negotiate encoding with server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Koha | Reporter: | Pongtawat <pongtawat> |
Component: | Cataloging | Assignee: | Pongtawat <pongtawat> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Ian Walls <koha.sekjal> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | P5 - low | CC: | chris, dpavlin, egpetridis, indradg, kyle, magnus |
Version: | rel_3_2 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Change sponsored?: | --- | Patch complexity: | --- |
Documentation contact: | Documentation submission: | ||
Text to go in the release notes: | Version(s) released in: | ||
Circulation function: | |||
Attachments: |
Add UTF-8 charset negotiation to Z39.50 search
Bug 7967 - set charset when doing Z39.50 search set charste for Z39.50 in acquision Bug 7967 : Followup set encoding options for acqui/z3950_search.pl |
Description
Pongtawat
2012-04-16 05:53:15 UTC
Comment hidden (obsolete)
Created attachment 9222 [details] [review] Bug 7967 - set charset when doing Z39.50 search Original patch from Pongtawat Created attachment 9250 [details] [review] set charste for Z39.50 in acquision I just notice that there is another Z39.50 client code in acquision that should also be updated (acqui/z3950_search.pl). I think it should be included in the patch (but I don't know how). Created attachment 9667 [details] [review] Bug 7967 : Followup set encoding options for acqui/z3950_search.pl Can we get a test plan for this? The code that these patches touched has been moved to C4::Breeding (and concolidated into a single function) by bug 9105. I just found that setting this charset option broke some Z39.50 servers. For example, for OhioLink server, it will freeze. Horizon Z39.50 server here seem to not like it either. So, it shouldn't be set unless needed. Since I need to set this option for OCLC to work properly for Thai language, so locally, I just hacked it to have a new option "UTF-8 with negotiation" to do this. Since it seems no one else has this problem, maybe the code should be leave as-is and this bug closed? (In reply to Pongtawat from comment #7) > > Since it seems no one else has this problem, maybe the code should be leave > as-is and this bug closed? This is the last comment from 2013. I'll close as WONTFIX. |