Bug 12625 - Batch delete component parts when deleting the parent from detailed-view
Summary: Batch delete component parts when deleting the parent from detailed-view
Status: BLOCKED
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Cataloging (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement
Assignee: Olli-Antti Kivilahti
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 11175
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2014-07-22 09:51 UTC by Olli-Antti Kivilahti
Modified: 2015-09-03 09:15 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Small patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:
Circulation function:

Attachments
Bug 12625 - (KD-153) Batch delete component parts when deleting the parent from detailed-view (1.79 KB, patch)
2014-07-22 09:53 UTC, Olli-Antti Kivilahti 		Details | Diff | Splinter Review
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Olli-Antti Kivilahti 2014-07-22 09:51:55 UTC 
See Bug 11175 for explanation of component parts.
This feature automatically deletes all linked component parts when the component parent is deleted using
  "catalogue/detail.pl -> Edit -> Delete record"

Generalizing this to C4::Biblio::DelBiblio() is not a good idea because we don't wan't to delete all component parts when we are for example, merging records :)
Comment 1 Olli-Antti Kivilahti 2014-07-22 09:53:04 UTC 
Created attachment 29950 [details] [review]
Bug 12625 - (KD-153) Batch delete component parts when deleting the parent from detailed-view

See Bug 11175 for explanation of component parts.
This feature automatically deletes all linked component parts when the component parent is deleted using
  "catalogue/detail.pl -> Edit -> Delete record"

Generalizing this to C4::Biblio::DelBiblio() is not a good idea because we don't wan't to delete all
component parts when we are for example, merging records :)
Comment 2 Jonathan Druart 2015-09-03 09:15:26 UTC 
Blocked by 12625
Comment 3 Jonathan Druart 2015-09-03 09:15:41 UTC 
11175 :)