Bug 16982 - Add EDI account to new menu on vendor page
Summary: Add EDI account to new menu on vendor page
Status: Failed QA
Alias: None
Product: Koha
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Acquisitions (show other bugs)
Version: Main
Hardware: All All
: P5 - low enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Nicole C. Engard
QA Contact: Testopia
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-07-26 16:10 UTC by Nicole C. Engard
Modified: 2016-08-14 14:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Change sponsored?: ---
Patch complexity: Trivial patch
Documentation contact:
Documentation submission:
Text to go in the release notes:
Version(s) released in:


Attachments
Bug 16982: Add EDI Account to Vendor New Menu (1.44 KB, patch)
2016-07-26 16:12 UTC, Nicole C. Engard
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Bug 16982: Add EDI Account to Vendor New Menu (1.48 KB, patch)
2016-07-26 18:54 UTC, Marc Véron
Details | Diff | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nicole C. Engard 2016-07-26 16:10:15 UTC
It would be great if you could jump to creating a vendor account from the vendor menu.
Comment 1 Nicole C. Engard 2016-07-26 16:12:06 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Marc Véron 2016-07-26 18:54:11 UTC
Created attachment 53733 [details] [review]
Bug 16982: Add EDI Account to Vendor New Menu

This patch adds a new option under the 'New'
button on the vendor page to take you to EDI
Accounts management.

To test:
* Log in to Koha
* Visit Acquisitions
* Add a new vendor (or search for a vendor)
* Click 'New'
* See link to EDI Accounts (if you have permission)
* Click and it should take you to the EDI Accounts area

Signed-off-by: Marc <veron@veron.ch>
Comment 3 Katrin Fischer 2016-08-14 14:32:44 UTC
Tiny capitalization issue "EDI Account" and a question: 

My expectation for this feature was that I'd be led to a page where I could add an EDI account for the vendor I came from - so I was surprised that the vendor that showed on 'new' was not the one I had started from. Could we improve this?